Questions? hello@viberation.devGet supportBlogDocsChangelog

Colour mode

XGitHub
Get started

Receiving Code Review

Skills#code-generation

Weigh review feedback before acting on it.

From Superpowers. When your agent receives review comments, especially unclear or questionable ones, it checks them technically before implementing any suggestion.

Install this skill

npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill receiving-code-review

Runs the open-source skills CLI in your own terminal. It asks which agents to add the skill to. Read what it tells your agent to do before you install it.

Download skill (.zip)

Install for your agent

  • Claude Code

    Run this in your project

    npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill receiving-code-review -a claude-code

    Add -g to install it for every project instead.

    Or ask Claude Code to do it

    Install the "receiving-code-review" skill from https://github.com/obra/superpowers for Claude Code.
Copy the skill folder (the one containing SKILL.md, with any scripts or reference files next to it) into .claude/skills/ in this project.
Before copying, show me the SKILL.md and list any scripts it includes, and wait for me to confirm.

    Or copy the folder yourself

    Unzip the download into .claude/skills/ for this project, or ~/.claude/skills/ for all your projects.

    Picked up in the current session, no restart needed.

    Claude Code skills docs
  • Claude.ai

    Upload the ZIP

    1. In Settings > Capabilities, turn on Code execution and file creation.
    2. Go to Customize > Skills, press +, then Create skill.
    3. Choose Upload a skill and pick the ZIP you downloaded.

    Free, Pro and Max plans. On Team and Enterprise, an owner turns skills on in Organization settings first.

    Claude.ai skills docs
  • ChatGPT

    Upload the ZIP

    1. Open Skills in ChatGPT and select Create.
    2. Select Upload from your computer and pick the ZIP you downloaded.
    3. Wait for ChatGPT's safety scan. A skill marked Needs Review asks you to check it before use.

    Skills that rely on scripts or a terminal may not work unchanged in ChatGPT.

    ChatGPT skills docs
  • Codex

    Run this in your project

    npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill receiving-code-review -a codex

    Add -g to install it for every project instead.

    Or ask Codex to do it

    Install the "receiving-code-review" skill from https://github.com/obra/superpowers for Codex.
Copy the skill folder (the one containing SKILL.md, with any scripts or reference files next to it) into .agents/skills/ in this project.
Before copying, show me the SKILL.md and list any scripts it includes, and wait for me to confirm.

    Or copy the folder yourself

    Unzip the download into .agents/skills/ for this project, or ~/.agents/skills/ for all your projects.

    Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.

    Codex skills docs
  • Cursor

    Run this in your project

    npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill receiving-code-review -a cursor

    Add -g to install it for every project instead.

    Or ask Cursor to do it

    Install the "receiving-code-review" skill from https://github.com/obra/superpowers for Cursor.
Copy the skill folder (the one containing SKILL.md, with any scripts or reference files next to it) into .cursor/skills/ in this project.
Before copying, show me the SKILL.md and list any scripts it includes, and wait for me to confirm.

    Or copy the folder yourself

    Unzip the download into .cursor/skills/ for this project, or ~/.cursor/skills/ for all your projects.

    Run it by typing / and the skill name in chat.

    Cursor skills docs
  • GitHub Copilot

    Run this in your project

    npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill receiving-code-review -a github-copilot

    Add -g to install it for every project instead.

    Or ask GitHub Copilot to do it

    Install the "receiving-code-review" skill from https://github.com/obra/superpowers for GitHub Copilot.
Copy the skill folder (the one containing SKILL.md, with any scripts or reference files next to it) into .github/skills/ in this project.
Before copying, show me the SKILL.md and list any scripts it includes, and wait for me to confirm.

    Or copy the folder yourself

    Unzip the download into .github/skills/ for this project, or ~/.copilot/skills/ for all your projects.

    Works in Copilot CLI, the cloud agent and agent mode in VS Code and JetBrains.

    GitHub Copilot skills docs
  • Antigravity

    Run this in your project

    npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill receiving-code-review -a antigravity

    Add -g to install it for every project instead.

    Or ask Antigravity to do it

    Install the "receiving-code-review" skill from https://github.com/obra/superpowers for Antigravity.
Copy the skill folder (the one containing SKILL.md, with any scripts or reference files next to it) into .agents/skills/ in this project.
Before copying, show me the SKILL.md and list any scripts it includes, and wait for me to confirm.

    Or copy the folder yourself

    Unzip the download into .agents/skills/ for this project, or ~/.gemini/config/skills/ for all your projects.

    Antigravity skills docs
  • Gemini CLI

    Run this in your project

    npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill receiving-code-review -a gemini-cli

    Add -g to install it for every project instead.

    Or ask Gemini CLI to do it

    Install the "receiving-code-review" skill from https://github.com/obra/superpowers for Gemini CLI.
Copy the skill folder (the one containing SKILL.md, with any scripts or reference files next to it) into .gemini/skills/ in this project.
Before copying, show me the SKILL.md and list any scripts it includes, and wait for me to confirm.

    Or copy the folder yourself

    Unzip the download into .gemini/skills/ for this project, or ~/.gemini/skills/ for all your projects.

    Run /skills to check it was found.

    Gemini CLI skills docs
Installs
192.1K via skills.sh
GitHub
286.3K stars ↗
Last updated
12 Sept 2026
Licence
MIT

Security checks

Run by independent scanners and published on skills.sh. Their results, not a Viberation review.

  • Gen Agent Trust Hub Pass

    The skill provides behavioral instructions for handling code review feedback, emphasizing technical skepticism and verification. No malicious patterns or dangerous code behaviors were detected.

    17 Feb 2026

  • Socket Pass

    No alerts

    18 Mar 2026

  • Snyk Pass

    Risk: LOW · No issues

    17 Feb 2026

  • Runlayer Pass

    1 file scanned · No issues

    26 Feb 2026

  • ZeroLeaks Pass

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

    16 Apr 2026
What's inside (1 file)
  • SKILL.md6.2K chars

SKILL.md, first part. Shown as plain text.

---
name: receiving-code-review
description: Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
---

# Code Review Reception

## Overview

Code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance.

**Core principle:** Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Technical correctness over social comfort.

## The Response Pattern

```
WHEN receiving code review feedback:

1. READ: Complete feedback without reacting
2. UNDERSTAND: Restate requirement in own words (or ask)
3. VERIFY: Check against codebase reality
4. EVALUATE: Technically sound for THIS codebase?
5. RESPOND: Technical acknowledgment or reasoned pushback
6. IMPLEMENT: One item at a time, test each
```

## Forbidden Responses

**NEVER:**
- "You're absolutely right!" (explicit instruction-file violation)
- "Great point!" / "Excellent feedback!" (performative)
- "Let me implement that now" (before verification)

**INSTEAD:**
- Restate the technical requirement
- Ask clarifying questions
- Push back with technical reasoning if wrong
- Just start working (actions > words)

## Handling Unclear Feedback

```
IF any item is unclear:
  STOP - do not implement anything yet
  ASK for clarification on unclear items

WHY: Items may be related. Partial understanding = wrong implementation.
```

**Example:**
```
your human partner: "Fix 1-6"
You understand 1,2,3,6. Unclear on 4,5.

❌ WRONG: Implement 1,2,3,6 now, ask about 4,5 later
✅ RIGHT: "I understand items 1,2,3,6. Need clarification on 4 and 5 before proceeding."
```

## Source-Specific Handling

### From your human partner
- **Trusted** - implement after understanding
- **Still ask** if scope unclear
- **No performative agreement**
- **Skip to action** or technical acknowledgment

### From External Reviewers
```
BEFORE implementing:
  1. Check: Technically correct for THIS codebase?
  2. Check: Breaks existing functionality?
  3. Check: Reason for current implementation?
  4. Check: Works on all platforms/versions?
  5. Check: Does reviewer understand full context?

IF suggestion seems wrong:
  Push back with technical reasoning

IF can't easily verify:
  Say so: "I can't verify this without [X]. Should I [investigate/ask/proceed]?"

IF conflicts with your human partner's prior decisions:
  Stop and discuss with your human partner first
```

**your human partner's rule:** "External feedback - be skeptical, but check carefully"

## YAGNI Check for "Professional" Features

```
IF reviewer suggests "implementing properly":
  grep codebase for actual usage

  IF unused: "This endpoint isn't called. Remove it (YAGNI)?"
  IF used: Then implement properly
```

**your human partner's rule:** "You and reviewer both report to me. If we don't need this feature, don't add it."

## Implementation Order

```
FOR multi-item feedback:
  1. Clarify anything unclear FIRST
  2. Then implement in this order:
     - Blocking issues (breaks, security)
     - Simple fixes (typos, imports)
     - Complex fixes (refactoring, logic)
  3. Test each fix individually
  4. Verify no regressions
```

## When To Push Back

Push back when:
- Suggestion breaks existing functionality
- Reviewer lacks full context
- Violates YAGNI (unused feature)
- Technically incorrect for this stack
- Legacy/compatibility reasons exist
- Conflicts with your human partner's architectural decisions

**How to push back:**
- Use technical reasoning, not defensiveness
- Ask specific questions
- Reference working tests/code
- Involve your human partner if architectural

**If you're uncomfortable pushing back out loud:** Name that tension, then tell your partner about the issue you've seen. They'll appreciate your honesty.

## Acknowledging Correct Feedback

When feedback IS correct:
```
✅ "Fixed. [Brief description of what changed]"
✅ "Good catch - [specific issue]. Fixed in [loca

Key info

Pricing
Open source
Category
Skills

Related reading

More in Skills